# An Interpreter with Lazy Evaluation

## The Big Idea

In this section we will implement a normal-order language that is the same as Scheme, except that compound procedures are non-strict in each argument. Primitive procedures will still be strict. It is not difficult to modify the evaluator of Lesson 12 so that the language it interprets behaves this way. Almost all the required changes center around procedure application.

(Remember, the choices above are just that: choices! The metacircular evaluator from Lesson 12 works perfectly fine, but sometimes we want Scheme to act differently. This section will be about modifying the MCE code so that our interpreted Scheme is normal-order.)

The basic idea is that, when applying a procedure, the interpreter must determine which arguments are to be evaluated and which are to be delayed. The delayed arguments are not evaluated; instead, they are transformed into objects called thunks. The thunk must contain the information required to produce the value of the argument when it is needed, as if it had been evaluated at the time of the application. Thus, the thunk must contain the argument expression and the environment in which the procedure application is being evaluated.

The process of evaluating the expression in a thunk is called forcing. In general, a thunk will be forced only when its value is needed: when it is passed to a primitive procedure that will use the value of the thunk; when it is the value of a predicate of a conditional; and when it is the value of an operator that is about to be applied as a procedure. One design choice we have available is whether or not to memoize thunks, as we did with delayed objects in Lesson 11. With memoization, the first time a thunk is forced, it stores the value that is computed. Subsequent forcings simply return the stored value without repeating the computation. We'll make our interpreter memoize, because this is more efficient for many applications. There are tricky considerations here, however.

## Modifying the Evaluator

The main difference between the lazy evaluator and the one in Lesson 12 is in the handling of procedure applications in eval and apply.

The application? clause of eval becomes

((application? exp)
(apply (actual-value (operator exp) env)
(operands exp)
env))


This is almost the same as the application? clause of eval in Lesson 12. For lazy evaluation, however, we call apply with the operand expressions, rather than the arguments produced by evaluating them. Since we will need the environment to construct thunks if the arguments are to be delayed, we must pass this as well. We still evaluate the operator, because apply needs the actual procedure to be applied in order to dispatch on its type (primitive versus compound) and apply it.

Whenever we need the actual value of an expression, we use

(define (actual-value exp env)
(force-it (eval exp env)))


instead of just eval, so that if the expression's value is a thunk, it will be forced.

## Modifying apply

Our new version of apply is also almost the same as the version in MCE. The difference is that eval has passed in unevaluated operand expressions: For primitive procedures (which are strict), we evaluate all the arguments before applying the primitive; for compound procedures (which are non-strict) we delay all the arguments before applying the procedure.

(define (apply procedure arguments env)
(cond ((primitive-procedure? procedure)
(apply-primitive-procedure
procedure
(list-of-arg-values arguments env)))  ; changed
((compound-procedure? procedure)
(eval-sequence
(procedure-body procedure)
(extend-environment
(procedure-parameters procedure)
(list-of-delayed-args arguments env) ; changed
(procedure-environment procedure))))
(else
(error
"Unknown procedure type -- APPLY" procedure))))


The procedures that process the arguments are just like list-of-values from Lesson 12, except that list-of-delayed-args delays the arguments instead of evaluating them, and list-of-arg-values uses actual-value instead of eval:

(define (list-of-arg-values exps env)
(if (no-operands? exps)
'()
(cons (actual-value (first-operand exps) env)
(list-of-arg-values (rest-operands exps)
env))))
(define (list-of-delayed-args exps env)
(if (no-operands? exps)
'()
(cons (delay-it (first-operand exps) env)
(list-of-delayed-args (rest-operands exps)
env))))


## Handling if

The other place we must change the evaluator is in the handling ofif, where we must use actual-value instead of eval to get the value of the predicate expression before testing whether it is true or false:

(define (eval-if exp env)
(if (true? (actual-value (if-predicate exp) env))
(eval (if-consequent exp) env)
(eval (if-alternative exp) env)))


## Modifying the driver-loop

Finally, we must change the driver-loop procedure (the read-eval-print loop) to use actual-value instead of eval, so that if a delayed value is propagated back to the read-eval-print loop, it will be forced before being printed. We also change the prompts to indicate that this is the lazy evaluator:

(define input-prompt ";;; L-Eval input:")
(define output-prompt ";;; L-Eval value:")
(define (driver-loop)
(prompt-for-input input-prompt)
(let ((output
(actual-value input the-global-environment)))
(announce-output output-prompt)
(user-print output)))
(driver-loop))


## Testing it Out

With these changes made, we can start the evaluator and test it. The successful evaluation of the try expression discussed in the section on Normal vs. Applicative Order indicates that the interpreter is performing lazy evaluation:

(define the-global-environment (setup-environment))
(driver-loop)
;;; L-Eval input:
(define (try a b)
(if (= a 0) 1 b))
;;; L-Eval value:
ok
;;; L-Eval input:
(try 0 (/ 1 0))
;;; L-Eval value:
1


## Representing Thunks

Our evaluator must arrange to create thunks when procedures are applied to arguments and to force these thunks later. A thunk must package an expression together with the environment, so that the argument can be produced later. To force the thunk, we simply extract the expression and environment from the thunk and evaluate the expression in the environment. We use actual-value rather than eval so that in case the value of the expression is itself a thunk, we will force that, and so on, until we reach something that is not a thunk:

(define (force-it obj)
(if (thunk? obj)
(actual-value (thunk-exp obj) (thunk-env obj))
obj))


One easy way to package an expression with an environment is to make a list containing the expression and the environment. Thus, we create a thunk as follows:

(define (delay-it exp env)
(list 'thunk exp env))

(define (thunk? obj)
(tagged-list? obj 'thunk))



Actually, what we want for our interpreter is not quite this, but rather thunks that have been memoized. When a thunk is forced, we will turn it into an evaluated thunk by replacing the stored expression with its value and changing the thunk tag so that it can be recognized as already evaluated.

(define (evaluated-thunk? obj)
(tagged-list? obj 'evaluated-thunk))

(define (thunk-value evaluated-thunk)
(define (force-it obj)
(cond ((thunk? obj)
(let ((result (actual-value
(thunk-exp obj)
(thunk-env obj))))
(set-car! obj 'evaluated-thunk)
(set-car! (cdr obj) result)  ; replace exp with its value
(set-cdr! (cdr obj) '())     ; forget unneeded env
result))
((evaluated-thunk? obj)
(thunk-value obj))
(else obj)))


Notice that the same delay-it procedure works both with and without memoization.

12 - Analyzing Evaluator and Lazy Evaluator